|
March 22,
2006
Greetings,
The story
below my email here came from Lester Brown
www.earth-policy.org today and is
reprinted here with permission.
The crux of
the story is that wind generated electricity
in Austin, Texas is now cheaper than
alternatives primarily due to the rising
cost of natural gas used by Austin Power.
The demand for green is now exceeding their
supply and in fairness to customers, they
are having a drawing to decide who
gets the cheap green renewable energy.
One of
the concerns often expressed about EcoCover
is that it isn't cheap enough.
Actually, EcoCover is fairly priced because
the product includes all of the costs
including the environmental costs in the
product.
Plastic film,
on the other hand, does not include all of
the environmental costs we pay from the
consumption of non-renewable resources,
disposal of waste plastic, VOC's emitted in
the maufacturing process and green house gas
emissions.
With the price
of petroleum now forever rising, the
day will not be too far away when EcoCover
manufacturing plant owners may be having
drawings to determine which
customers get the cheap green
organically certified 100% biodegradable
EcoCover mulch mats made from waste paper.
The future is
EcoCover.
==========================
March 22,
2006WIND ENERGY
DEMAND BOOMING:
Cost Dropping Below
Conventional Sources Marks Key Milestone in
U.S. Shift to Renewable Energy
www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2006/Update52.htm
Lester R. Brown
When Austin Energy,
the publicly owned utility in Austin, Texas,
launched its GreenChoice program in 2000,
customers opting for green electricity paid
a premium. During the fall of 2005, climbing
natural gas prices pulled conventional
electricity costs above those of
wind-generated electricity, the source of
most green power. This crossing of the cost
lines in Austin and several other
communities is a milestone in the U.S. shift
to a renewable energy economy.
Austin Energy buys
wind-generated electricity under 10-year,
fixed-price contracts and passes this stable
price on to its GreenChoice subscribers.
This fixed-price
energy product is quite attractive to
Austin’s 388 corporate GreenChoice
customers, including Advanced Micro Devices,
Dell, IBM, Samsung, and 3M. Advanced Micro
Devices expects to save $4 million over the
next decade through this arrangement. School
districts are also signing up. Round Rock
School District, for example, projects
10-year savings to local taxpayers at $2
million.
Facing a Texas-style
stampede of consumers wanting to sign up for
the current remaining supply of green
electricity, Austin Energy has resorted to a
GreenChoice raffle that will be held on
March 23. All its customers
—both
residential and business—were
invited to participate in the drawing.
A similar situation
has unfolded in Colorado with Xcel Energy,
which is the state’s largest electricity
supplier. Xcel’s 33,000 Windsource
customers, who until late 2005 were paying
$6 more each month for their electricity,
are now paying slightly less than those
using conventional electricity, which comes
mostly from natural gas and coal. To meet
fast-growing demand, Xcel is currently
soliciting proposals from wind developers
for up to 775 megawatts of new wind power
generation, enough to supply 232,000
Colorado homes with electricity.
Austin Energy and Xcel
Energy are among the first utilities to pass
on the falling cost of wind energy to their
customers. In the short run, the price
advantage of wind over conventional
electricity may disappear as the surging
demand for wind electricity from
climate-conscious customers outruns the
supply, driving up the price, and as natural
gas prices fall from their late 2005 highs.
Over the longer term, however, as reserves
of natural gas are depleted, its price is
projected to rise, giving a strong advantage
to wind.
Interest in wind
energy is rising as production costs fall.
Although media attention focuses on
communities with a not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY)
response to wind turbines, such as the
large, off-shore wind farm planned off Cape
Cod, in most of the country wind farms are
enthusiastically welcomed. Here, it’s the
PIIMBY syndrome
—put-it-in-my-backyard.
When Xcel announced it
would develop several hundred megawatts of
additional wind-generating capacity, it got
the attention of ranching communities
throughout wind-rich eastern Colorado. In
tiny ranch-country towns like Grover, near
the Wyoming border, ranchers welcomed a
proposed 300-megawatt wind farm that would
span some 30 ranches.
With a large,
advanced-design wind turbine generating
easily $100,000 worth of electricity per
year, even a 3-percent royalty would earn
ranchers $3,000 a year from leasing a
quarter-acre of ranchland. And they can
still run cattle on the land. If the
proposed project is approved as expected,
these 30 or so ranchers will have an average
of seven turbines each, yielding roughly
$21,000 a year in additional income. A
decade from now, there may be thousands of
ranchers who will be earning more selling
electricity than they do selling cattle.
In upstate New York,
dairy farmers in Lewis County near Lake
Ontario warmly embraced the 195-turbine
Maple Ridge Wind Farm, and the $5,000 to
$10,000-annual royalty offered for each of
the turbines on their land.
Rural communities
welcome wind farms because they provide
income to farmers and ranchers, skilled
jobs, cheap electricity, and additional tax
revenue to upgrade schools and maintain
roads.
The growing
profitability of wind energy is attracting
big-time players.
Four years ago,
General Electric purchased Enron Wind, one
of Enron’s few profitable segments,
parlaying its advanced wind turbine design
into a leading position in the world wind
turbine market.
In mid-2005, Goldman
Sachs purchased Zilkha Renewable Energy, a
small wind farm development company. Now
called Horizon Wind Energy, this
wholly-owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs has
under construction or in the planning stages
4,000 megawatts of wind-generated
electricity, enough to supply electricity to
1.2 million homes.
AES, a leading
international player in electricity
generation, has used its purchase of SeaWest,
another wind developer, to establish a
strong position in the U.S. wind sector. It
now has under development 1,800 megawatts of
wind-generating capacity. Shell, one of the
leading bidders for offshore wind rights in
the United Kingdom, owns 315 megawatts of
wind-generating capacity in the United
States and is planning more. And BP is
mapping out areas in the United States where
it could build some 2,000 megawatts of
wind-generating capacity.
Overall, U.S.
wind-generating capacity expanded by 36
percent in 2005, reaching 9,149 megawatts.
This year it could expand by 50 percent. At
the end of 2005, there were commercial wind
farms in 30 states. (Data at
www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2006/Update52_data.htm.)
Wind power generation
would grow even faster if it were not
constrained by the availability of turbines.
General Electric, now supplying 60 percent
of the U.S. wind turbine market, is sold out
through 2007. Clipper Windpower, a startup
turbine manufacturer, is planning to produce
20 of its 2.5-megawatt Liberty turbines per
month by mid 2006 and a total of 250
turbines in 2007. Its production is also
committed well into the future.
After years of
industry uncertainty, when Congress allowed
the wind production tax credit (PTC) to
lapse several times, the 2005 PTC extension
through 2007 has given investors renewed
confidence in the future of wind power. The
extension of the PTC, which is designed to
offset subsidies to fossil fuels and nuclear
power, is leading to record growth in the
number of new wind farms planned.
Wind energy is
emerging as a centerpiece of the new energy
economy, because it is abundant,
inexpensive, inexhaustible, widely
distributed, clean, and climate-benign.
Three of the 50 states
—North
Dakota, Kansas, and Texas—have
enough harnessable wind energy to satisfy
national electricity needs. The cost of
wind-generated electricity has fallen from
38¢ per kilowatt-hour in the early 1980s to
4¢ to 6¢ today, offering an almost endless
supply of cheap energy.
Beyond that, these
wells will never go dry. No one can cut off
the supply or raise the fuel cost. And wind
can supply our energy needs without
disrupting the earth’s climate.
# # #
Lester R. Brown is
President of the Earth Policy Institute and
author of Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet
Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble.
Data and additional
resources at
http://www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2006/Update52_data.htm
or contact jlarsen(at)earthpolicy.org
For more in-depth
information see Chapter 10, in Plan B 2.0,
at
http://www.earthpolicy.org/Books/PB2/Contents.htm
For reprint permission contact
rjkauffman(at)earthpolicy.org
If you are interested
in the EcoCover manufacturing plant opportunity,
please contact me. Or, if you know of someone who
would be interested, please contact me to discuss.
Another plug for my
good friend Lester Brown: Go to
www.earth-policy.org
and order Lester's books Plan B 2.0
and Outgrowing the Earth. You will
then clearly understand why I say.....
The future is EcoCover.
Cheers,
Ron Castle
North American Business Development
EcoCover Developments Limited
Tennessee USA Office
Phone 931 967 2053
|